Ship Law Log - Reed Smith

• Seriously irregular? – Be careful, or your award may be challenged
• Judicial sale of superyacht Stefania: An opportunity to look into French ship arrest procedures
• “SAGAR RATAN”: Useful guidance on the BIMCO Infectious Diseases Clause
• Paris shipping update #2
• Damages for late redelivery – a lost opportunity (literally)?
• One event, two legal realities! Successful outcome for Reed Smith’s Paris shipping team in major cargo claim dispute
• Paris shipping update #1
• Keeping Risk at Arm’s Length – The Xing Zhi Hai [2024] EWHC 2371 (Comm)
• The importance of email sign offs: the formalities of executing a parent company guarantee under the Statute of Frauds 1677
• LNG sanctions on Russia – A fluid landscape
• Recovering rockets at sea: the intersection of space law and maritime law
• French Tonnage Tax Regime: a prime target in the midst of legislative elections
• The Ever Given Court of Appeal decision unveils contractual complexities in salvage agreements
• Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies the proper interpretation of Rule 9(a) of the Collision Regulations
• Insights from Reed Smith’s London International Shipping Week event: Managing your supply chain risk
• We want your thoughts – sustainable fuel
• Navigating Storms: Some legal strategies for contingency planning in shipping supply chains
• French Tonnage Tax regime saved by Government’s 49.3 move in Parliament
• Assessing the risk factor
• New CBP Jones Act Ruling Prevents Release of Vapor from LNG Loaded at 1st U.S. Port during Loading at 2nd U.S. Port
• Big waves: global autonomous ships market on the rise
• New U.S. Supreme Court decision recognizing enforceability of choice-of-law clauses in maritime contracts, subject to narrow exceptions
• Offshore wind farms: Climate commitments and challenges in the U.S.