Abstract Prior to 1998, the Hague-Visby Rules (HVRs) applied under Australian law to what is commonly referred to as the “ship’s rail to ship’s rail” period, meaning that the protections, …
Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal
Latest maritime news from Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal 13 articles shown
Want email alerts?
Sign in with LinkedIn
Recent Articles
Case Notes Arrest, Release, and the Equivalence of Substitute Security: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd V The Ship: Yangze 22 [2025] FCA 563
Case Notes Limitation of liability and forum non conveniens: Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd v The Ship: Yangze 22 (No 2) [2026] FCA 476
Case Notes A breach of the Fisheries Settlement: Te Ohu Kai Moana Trustee Ltd v Attorney-General [2025] NZHC 657, [2025] 2 NZLR 382
Abstract Prior to 1998, the Hague-Visby Rules applied under Australian law to what is commonly referred to as the “tackle-to-tackle” or “ships-rail to ships-rail” period. But times and Conventions change. …
Abstract This article analyses and compares the UNCITRAL Model Law of Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR) with the Electronic Trade Documents Act 2023 (UK) (ETDA). The purpose is to provide consideration …
Abstract Until the passage of the Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth) admiralty jurisdiction in Australia was governed by British legislation. This occurred through the commission of Vice Admiralty Courts in Australia …
Abstract The recent arbitral proceedings between Sino East Transportation and Grand Amazon required careful consideration and application of both the Inter-Club Agreement and the implied indemnity to a complex set …
Case Notes The relationship of securities over subrogation, and admiralty proceedings: Da Hui Shipping (Pte) Ltd v An Rong Shipping Pte Ltd [2025] SGCA 30
Addresses Dethridge Memorial Address 2025 : ADMIRALTY THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
Abstract The High Court of Australia’s decisions in Carmichael, Tesseract and Chevron show that the principle of minimal curial intervention in arbitration in Australia remains contentious. Minimal curial intervention is …
Case Notes LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR WRECK REMOVAL CLAIMS IN AUSTRALIA – TASMANIAN PORTS CORPORATION PTY LTD V CSL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (THE GOLIATH) [2025] FCAFC 53
Stay Updated with Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal
Never miss important maritime news from Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal. Set up personalized alerts or search for specific topics to stay informed about industry developments.